跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究随机试验中的处理效应估计、协变量调整和设计相关推断,直接属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

Model-Robust Inference for Clinical Trials that Improve Precision by Stratified Randomization and Covariate Adjustment

结合分层随机化与协变量调整的临床试验模型稳健推断

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Bingkai Wang
Ryoko Susukida
Ramin Mojtabai
Michael Rosenblum

结合分层随机化与协变量调整的临床试验模型稳健推断

研究问题
临床试验如何同时利用分层随机化与协变量调整提高处理效应估计精度,并在工作模型误设或结局缺失时提供有效推断?
方法与思路
作者为一类结合两种设计与分析方法的估计量推导一致性、渐近正态性及稳健方差,并处理随机缺失与多类结局。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方差公式可捕捉两种方法的精度收益,并给出分层随机化下Kaplan–Meier估计的理论及偏置硬币设计扩展。
阅读关注点
核对模型稳健所允许的误设、随机缺失假设与方差公式,检查各结局及随机化设计的适用条件和三项试验的比较基准。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;模型稳健不免除随机化与缺失机制条件,所报告精度收益仅来自特定试验。

原文摘要

Two commonly used methods for improving precision and power in clinical trials are stratified randomization and covariate adjustment. However, many trials do not fully capitalize on the combined precision gains from these two methods, which can lead to wasted resources in terms of sample size and trial duration. We derive consistency and asymptotic normality of model-robust estimators that combine these two methods, and show that these estimators can lead to substantial gains in precision and power. Our theorems cover a class of estimators that handle continuous, binary, and time-to-event outcomes; missing outcomes under the missing at random assumption are handled as well. For each estimator, we give a formula for a consistent variance estimator that is model-robust and that fully captures variance reductions from stratified randomization and covariate adjustment. Also, we give the first proof (to the best of our knowledge) of consistency and asymptotic normality of the Kaplan–Meier estimator under stratified randomization, and we derive its asymptotic variance. The above results also hold for the biased-coin covariate-adaptive design. We demonstrate our results using data from three trials of substance use disorder treatments, where the variance reduction due to stratified randomization and covariate adjustment ranges from 1% to 36%. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文