On the Relationship between Stepwise Decision Procedures and Confidence Sets
逐步决策程序与置信集的关系AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般多重推断与置信集构造,没有归入所列领域细分的明确文本依据。
逐步决策程序与置信集的关系AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article considers the relationship between two standard methods of inference on a set of A: unknown parameters, namely stepwise decision procedures and the construction of simultaneous confidence intervals. Illustrative examples with k = 2 are discussed for one-sided step-down and step-up decision procedures and for a two-sided step-down decision procedure. For these examples with normal distributional assumptions, a set of confidence intervals associated with the decision procedure is constructed that provides additional information at no increase in the error rate. The implication of this work is that commonly used stepwise decision procedures are per se not providing as complete an inference as is available. The construction of new decision procedures and confidence sets designed specifically to meet an experimenter's particular requirements is also discussed.