跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般线性回归的同时置信带,未明确涉及因果效应、时间序列或其他所列细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Max Halperin
Suresh C. Rastogi
Irwin Ho
Y. Y. Yang

线性回归中更窄的置信带

研究问题
当线性回归自变量受到符号或取值约束时,如何利用这些限制构造同时置信带,减少传统 Scheffé 方法的保守性?
方法与思路
作者针对各自变量符号已知的情形推导同时覆盖概率的非平凡下界,据此建立多重比较程序,并提供涉及二至四个参数的临界值表。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在两种方法均适用时,利用约束可在给定置信概率下获得更窄的置信带,并为特定符号约束情形提供实施依据。
阅读关注点
核对自变量约束如何进入覆盖事件、概率下界与实际覆盖率的区别,以及非负自变量多项式回归和临界值表的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未说明完整回归假设与置信带公式,不能把带宽改善推广到任意约束或模型。

原文摘要

In many linear regression problems, the values of the independent variable or variables may be subject to certain constraints. For example, the independent variables may necessarily be positive; as another example, the variables may not only all be positive but are powers of a single variable (e.g., polynomial regression on time). Previous writers considering the problem of obtaining confidence bands on a regression function for all values of the independent variable have not utilized such constraints; the usual basis for such bands has been the multiple comparison procedure of Scheffé which places no constraints at all upon the independent variables. Any procedure utilizing constraints will necessarily yield a uniform improvement over the method of Scheffé' (assuming both methods are applicable) in the sense of yielding narrower bands for a given confidence probability. In the present paper a non-trivial lower bound is obtained for the confidence probability associated with a multiple comparison procedure appropriate to the case where it can be assumed that each independent variable must be of specified sign; this includes, as a subclass, polynomial regression on a non-negative independent variable. This result gives a basis for a multiple comparison procedure less conservative than that of Scheffé when both are applicable. Implementation of the procedure requires the percentage points of a heretofore untabulated distribution. Tables of percentage points of this distribution appropriate to linear combinations of two, three, or four parameters are presented.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文