Regression Analysis Under Link Violation
链接函数设定偏离下的回归分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般回归错设理论,未明确涉及离散选择行为或经济结构识别。
链接函数设定偏离下的回归分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study the behavior of regression analysis when there might be some violation of the assumed link function, the functional form of the model which relates the outcome variable $y$ to the regressor variable $\mathbf{x}$ and the random error. We allow the true link function to be completely arbitrary, except that $y$ depends on $\mathbf{x}$ only through a linear combination $\beta\mathbf{x}$. The slope vector $\beta$ is identified only up to a multiplicative scalar. Under appropriate conditions, any maximum likelihood-type regression estimate is shown to be consistent for $\beta$ up to a multiplicative scalar, even though the estimate might be based on a misspecified link function. The crucial conditions are (1) the estimate is based on minimizing a criterion function $L(\theta, y)$ which is convex in $\theta$, where $\theta = a + b\mathbf{x}$, (2) the expected criterion function $E\lbrack L(a + b\mathbf{x}, y)\rbrack$ has a proper minimizer and (3) the regressor variable $\mathbf{x}$ is sampled randomly from a probability distribution such that $E(b\mathbf{x}\mid\beta\mathbf{x})$ is linear in $\beta\mathbf{x}$ for all linear combinations $b\mathbf{x}$. The least squares estimate, the GLM estimates and the $M$-estimates for robust regression are discussed in detail. These estimates are asymptotically normal. With the assumption that the regressor variable has an elliptically symmetric distribution, we show that under a scale-invariant null hypothesis of the form $H_0: \beta W = 0$, the asymptotic covariance matrix for $\hat{\beta}W$ is proportional to the one derived by treating the assumed link function as being true. The Wald test as well as the likelihood ratio test for a scale-invariant null hypothesis has the correct asymptotic null distribution after an appropriate rescaling of the test statistic to account for the proportionality constant between the two asymptotic covariance matrices. For normally distributed $\mathbf{x}$, the rescaling factor for $M$-estimates is the same as the one used in robust regression, while the rescaling factor for GLM estimates is related to adjustment for overdispersion. Confidence sets can be constructed by inverting Wald's tests. The impact of the violation of linear conditional expectation condition 3 is discussed. A new dimension is added to the regression diagnostics by exploring the elliptical symmetry of the design distribution. A connection between this work and adaptive estimation is briefly discussed.