Using a Special Regressor to Identify Type I and Type II Error Probabilities, With an Illustrative Application to Miscarriages of Justice
利用特殊回归变量识别第一类与第二类错误概率:司法误判应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将研究问题转化为误分类二元选择模型,直接对应离散选择。
利用特殊回归变量识别第一类与第二类错误概率:司法误判应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We nonparametrically identify Type I and Type II error rates when mistakes are unobserved. Our strategy reframes the setting as a misclassified binary choice model, using a special regressor to identify the misclassification probabilities. Identification requires an exclusion restriction and a large support condition. When the exclusion restriction is in doubt, we show how our estimands can be interpreted as bounds under a weaker monotonicity condition. Bounds are also provided when the large support condition is violated. We apply our method to estimate miscarriages of justice in Virginia. Among defendants who proceeded to trial, the estimated probability of wrongful acquittal ranges from 18 to 42%, depending on offense type, race, and gender. Our method also produces estimates of wrongful conviction probabilities; however, these are very high, potentially reflecting the restriction of our sample to trial defendants and/or violations of key assumptions.