跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以已知因果关系的半合成制造数据为基础,支持因果发现算法的基准评估。

反馈分类问题

$\texttt{causalAssembly}$: Generating Realistic Production Data for Benchmarking Causal Discovery

causalAssembly:生成用于因果发现基准评估的真实感生产数据

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Konstantin Göbler
Tobias Windisch
Mathias Drton
Tim Pychynski
Steffen Sonntag
Martin Roth

causalAssembly:生成用于因果发现基准评估的真实感生产数据

研究问题
真实数据的因果关系难以获知且公开受隐私限制时,如何利用制造流程的物理知识构造可评估因果发现算法的数据?
方法与思路
作者结合装配线测量和物理过程提供的因果关系,用分布随机森林估计条件分布,再按指定因果模型生成半合成数据。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称构建了符合观测变量因果模型的数据生成系统,通过 Python 库提供条件分布与生成工具,并演示算法比较。
阅读关注点
应核对物理知识确定因果关系的依据、未观测变量的处理、条件分布拟合质量,以及半合成基准对算法的潜在偏向。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未获核实;摘要未说明真值验证细节,库的当前可用性也未核验。

原文摘要

Algorithms for causal discovery have recently undergone rapid advances and increasingly draw on flexible nonparametric methods to process complex data. With these advances comes a need for adequate empirical validation of the causal relationships learned by different algorithms. However, for most real data sources true causal relations remain unknown. This issue is further compounded by privacy concerns surrounding the release of suitable high-quality data. To help address these challenges, we gather a complex dataset comprising measurements from an assembly line in a manufacturing context. This line consists of numerous physical processes for which we are able to provide ground truth causal relationships on the basis of a detailed study of the underlying physics. We use the assembly line data and associated ground truth information to build a system for generation of semisynthetic manufacturing data that supports benchmarking of causal discovery methods. To accomplish this, we employ distributional random forests in order to flexibly estimate and represent conditional distributions that may be combined into joint distributions that strictly adhere to a causal model over the observed variables. The estimated conditionals and tools for data generation are made available in our Python library $\texttt{causalAssembly}$. Using the library, we showcase how to benchmark several well-known causal discovery algorithms.

笔记与分组