Adaptive-to-Model Hybrid of Tests for Regressions
适应模型的回归检验混合方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及通用回归模型检验和充分降维,缺少归入所列具体经济计量领域的直接文本证据。
适应模型的回归检验混合方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In model checking for regressions, nonparametric estimation-based tests usually have tractable limiting null distributions and are sensitive to oscillating alternative models, but suffer from the curse of dimensionality. In contrast, empirical process-based tests can, at the fastest possible rate, detect local alternatives distinct from the null model, yet are less sensitive to oscillating alternatives and rely on Monte Carlo approximation for critical value determination, which is costly in computation. We propose an adaptive-to-model hybrid of moment and conditional moment-based tests to fully inherit the merits of these two types of tests and avoid the shortcomings. Further, such a hybrid makes nonparametric estimation-based tests, under the alternatives, also share the merits of existing empirical process-based tests. The methodology can be readily applied to other kinds of data and construction of other hybrids. As a by-product in sufficient dimension reduction field, a study on residual-related central mean subspace and central subspace for model adaptation is devoted to showing when alternative models can be indicated and when cannot. Numerical studies are conducted to verify the powerfulness of the proposed test.