A Stable Measure of Similarity for Time Series using Persistent Homology
利用持久同调构造稳定的时间序列相似度量AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究时间序列之间的相似度、周期性和嵌入稳定性,直接对应时间序列方法,但未限定经济或金融应用。
利用持久同调构造稳定的时间序列相似度量AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Persistent homology, the study of holes that appear in data as one thickens balls centered around its points over time, has theoretically guaranteed stability. That is, small data perturbations guarantee small changes in the lifetimes of these holes. This stability has been used to construct a measure of periodicity for a single univariate time series, denoted score(f1). One popular measure of similarity between two time series is percent determinism (%DET), which measures the correlation between two time-series embeddings. We introduce a novel persistent-homology based measure of time-series similarity which we denote the bi-conditional periodicity score, score(f1,f2). We prove the stability of our measure under small time series and frequency perturbations, as well as the existence of a minimum embedding dimension for the convergence of our score. Our latter result implies that larger embedding dimensions may be necessary to reach desired levels of convergence. Since pairwise distances between points in these larger dimensions may start to concentrate, we also prove the stability of our measure under dimension reduction which guarantees that as long as the first K principal components capture a majority of the variance under orthogonal projection, the score will undergo small changes. We next introduce an algorithm for computing the bi-conditional periodicity score and deduce its computational complexity as O(N log N + PK^2 + P^6) for N the number of time series points, P the number of embedding points, and K the number of principal components. We experimentally verify the greater stability of our measure in comparison with %DET on both synthetic time series as well as real climate data. As well, score(f1,f2) requires only one parameter for its computation while %DET requires four.