Rate of Convergence for the Wild Bootstrap in Nonparametric Regression
非参数回归中野生自助法的收敛速度AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于一般非参数回归与自助法近似理论,未明确涉及所列计量领域细分。
非参数回归中野生自助法的收敛速度AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper concerns the distributions used to construct confidence intervals for the regression function in a nonparametric setup. Some rates of convergence for the normal limit, its plug-in approach and the wild bootstrap are obtained conditionally on the explanatory variable $X$ and also unconditionally. The bound found for the wild bootstrap approximation is slightly better (by a factor $n^{-1/45}$) than the bounds given by the plug-in approach or the CLT for the conditional probability. On the contrary, the unconditional bounds present a different feature: the rate obtained when approximating by the CLT improves the one given by the plug-in approach by a factor of $n^{-8/45},$ while this last one performs better than the wild bootstrap approximation and the corresponding ratio is $n^{-1/45}.$ It should be mentioned that these two sequences, especially the last one, tend to zero at an extremely slow rate.