跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要中的回归估计量属于调查抽样方法,未提供所列经济计量细分领域的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lih-Yuan Deng
C. F. J. Wu

回归估计量的方差估计

研究问题
在不放回简单随机抽样中,用于调查回归估计量的不同方差估计方法,其偏差、均方误差及区间覆盖表现如何?
方法与思路
作者比较设计型、模型型及一类新方差估计量,推导二阶表达式与偏差,并考察对应区间的条件和无条件覆盖率。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称理论与经验比较相互支持,并为调查实践中选择回归估计量的方差估计方法提供指导,同时提出进一步研究问题。
阅读关注点
应核对新估计量的构造、二阶展开所需条件及经验研究设置,区分方差估计误差与总体估计量本身的误差。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;未提供各方法的具体排序或数值结果,也不能将不放回简单随机抽样结论推广至任意复杂抽样设计。

原文摘要

The regression estimator and the ratio estimator are commonly used in survey practice. In the past more attention has been given to the ratio estimator because of its computational ease and applicability for general sampling designs. The ratio estimator is appropriate for populations whose regression line passes close to the origin. If the intercept of the regression line is significantly nonzero, however, it is much less efficient than the regression estimator (Deng 1984). In general, apart from n –2 terms, the mean squared error (MSE) of the former is bigger than that of the latter (Cochran 1977, p. 196). Given the present computing capacity, the computational advantage of the ratio estimator should be less of a concern and the regression estimator will gain wider popularity. The main purpose of this article is to provide a theoretical and empirical comparison of several variance estimators for the regression estimator in simple random sampling without replacement. The companion problem for the ratio estimator has been studied in the literature (see Wu and Deng 1983). Under comparison are several design-based and model-based estimators and a new class of estimators. Their second-order expressions and biases are derived and compared. Empirical results on the biases and MSE's of the variance estimators and the conditional and unconditional coverage probabilities of their associated t intervals are obtained. They lend support to the theoretical results and suggest questions for further investigation. Our empirical and theoretical study provides a guide to the use of these estimators in practice.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文