跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究条件工具变量下的因果效应识别及回归、加权估计,并应用于教育回报。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zhiqiang Tan

利用工具变量进行因果推断的回归与加权方法

研究问题
当工具变量与背景协变量有关时,如何通过条件于协变量的工具变量假设,估计工具所改变治疗状态人群的平均因果效应?
方法与思路
作者分别建立响应对工具变量的协变量调整回归,以及平衡不同工具组协变量的加权方法,将观测数据模型与因果假设分开。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,两种方法通过识别结果连接观测关联与因果效应,可容纳参数及半参数技术,并以教育回报估计展示应用。
阅读关注点
应核对条件工具变量假设、目标人群和效应识别结果,以及回归与加权模型的条件;还需核查摘要提及的补充材料更正与新结果。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;摘要标注补充材料含更正与新结果,但未提供其内容,无法判断它们对所述结论的影响。

原文摘要

Please see the supplementary material for a correction and a new result.Recent researches in econometrics and statistics have gained considerable insights into the use of instrumental variables (IVs) for causal inference. A basic idea is that IVs serve as an experimental handle, the turning of which may change each individual's treatment status and, through and only through this effect, also change observed outcome. The average difference in observed outcome relative to that in treatment status gives the average treatment effect for those whose treatment status is changed in this hypothetical experiment. We build on the modern IV framework and develop two estimation methods in parallel to regression adjustment and propensity score weighting in the case of treatment selection based on covariates. The IV assumptions are made explicitly conditional on covariates to allow for the fact that instruments can be related to these background variables. The regression method focuses on the relationship between responses (observed outcome and treatment status jointly) and instruments adjusted for covariates. The weighting method focuses on the relationship between instruments and covariates to balance different instrument groups with respect to covariates. For both methods, modeling assumptions are made directly on observed data and separated from the IV assumptions, whereas causal effects are inferred by combining observed data models with the IV assumptions through identification results. This approach is straightforward and flexible enough to host various parametric and semiparametric techniques that attempt to learn associational relationships from observed data. We illustrate the methods by an application to estimating returns to education.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文