Covariance Tapering for Likelihood-Based Estimation in Large Spatial Data Sets
大型空间数据集似然估计中的协方差截尾AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:研究核心是空间高斯过程与协方差计算,所列领域细分没有直接对应的空间统计方向。
大型空间数据集似然估计中的协方差截尾AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Maximum likelihood is an attractive method of estimating covariance parameters in spatial models based on Gaussian processes. But calculating the likelihood can be computationally infeasible for large data sets, requiring O(n3) calculations for a data set with n observations. This article proposes the method of covariance tapering to approximate the likelihood in this setting. In this approach, covariance matrixes are “tapered,” or multiplied element wise by a sparse correlation matrix. The resulting matrixes can then be manipulated using efficient sparse matrix algorithms. We propose two approximations to the Gaussian likelihood using tapering. One of these approximations simply replaces the model covariance with a tapered version, whereas the other is motivated by the theory of unbiased estimating equations. Focusing on the particular case of the Matérn class of covariance functions, we give conditions under which estimators maximizing the tapering approximations are, like the maximum likelihood estimator, strongly consistent. Moreover, we show in a simulation study that the tapering estimators can have sampling densities quite similar to that of the maximum likelihood estimator, even when the degree of tapering is severe. We illustrate the accuracy and computational gains of the tapering methods in an analysis of yearly total precipitation anomalies at weather stations in the United States.