跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究观察性数据中的混杂控制、协变量平衡和处理效应估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Simion De
Jared D. Huling

高维数据因果效应估计中的数据自适应协变量平衡

研究问题
高维观察性数据中,如何让直接加权平衡更重视真正影响处理和结果的混杂变量,同时降低参数模型误设与维度灾难的影响?
方法与思路
作者用随机森林分别建模处理与结果,以样本落入相同叶节点的比例构造相似度,形成强调相关协变量的分布距离并直接估计权重。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在适当假设下,权重以 L2 范数收敛到归一化逆倾向得分,并给出一致的处理效应估计;模拟和真实数据展示方法表现。
阅读关注点
应核对森林相似度如何合并两类模型、平衡优化的约束及重叠性条件,并检查权重收敛如何转化为效应估计和不确定性量化。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或接收未获核实。摘要未列出适当假设、收敛速度和推断程序,不能仅凭模拟描述认定普遍优于现有方法。

原文摘要

A key challenge in estimating causal effects from observational data is handling confounding and is commonly achieved through weighting methods that balance distribution of covariates between treatment and control groups. Weighting approaches can be classified by whether weights are estimated using parametric or nonparametric methods, and by whether the model relies on modeling and inverting the propensity score or directly estimates weights to achieve distributional balance by minimizing a measure of dissimilarity between groups. Parametric methods, both for propensity score modeling and direct balancing, are prone to model misspecification. In addition, balancing approaches often suffer from the curse of dimensionality, as they assign equal importance to all covariates, thus potentially de-emphasizing true confounders. Several methods, such as the outcome adaptive lasso, attempt to mitigate this issue through variable selection, but are parametric and focus on propensity score estimation rather than direct balancing. In this paper, we propose a nonparametric direct balancing approach that uses random forests to adaptively emphasize confounders. Our method jointly models treatment and outcome using random forests, allowing the data to identify covariates that influence both processes. We construct a similarity measure, defined by the proportion of trees in which two observations fall into the same leaf node, yielding a distance between treatment and control distributions that is sensitive to relevant covariates and captures the structure of confounding. Under suitable assumptions, we show that the resulting weights converge to normalized inverse propensity scores in the L2 norm and provide consistent treatment effect estimates. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through extensive simulations and an application to a real dataset.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文