The Lifecycle of a Statistical Model: Model Failure Detection, Identification, and Refitting
统计模型的生命周期：失效检测、定位与重新拟合AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要核心是通用模型监测与重新拟合，时间序列预测仅为应用之一，不足以归入特定计量领域细分。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
统计模型的生命周期：失效检测、定位与重新拟合
- 研究问题
- 模型部署后，如何发现预测表现开始下降的协变量子群，定位失效区域，并通过重新拟合改善这些区域的预测准确性？
- 方法与思路
- 作者构建子群失效检测、定位与重新拟合的方法，利用三个真实数据集展示应用，并在结构化正态均值设定下分析理论性质。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称方法能产生可解释的失效定位并改善预测，且在结构化正态均值设定下具有异常子群恢复和重新拟合的极小极大最优性。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对失效与异常子群的定义、检测阈值、重新拟合的数据使用方式，以及极小极大结论与实际部署场景的差距。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，同行评审及期刊接收未核验；摘要未说明理论设定的完整条件，三个应用也不足以证明普遍改善。
原文摘要
The statistical machine learning community has demonstrated considerable resourcefulness over the years in developing highly expressive tools for estimation, prediction, and inference. The bedrock assumptions underlying these developments are that the data comes from a fixed population and displays little heterogeneity. But reality is significantly more complex: statistical models now routinely fail when released into real-world systems and scientific applications, where such assumptions rarely hold. Consequently, we pursue a different path in this paper vis-a-vis the well-worn trail of developing new methodology for estimation and prediction. In this paper, we develop tools and theory for detecting and identifying regions of the covariate space (subpopulations) where model performance has begun to degrade, and study intervening to fix these failures through refitting. We present empirical results with three real-world data sets -- including a time series involving forecasting the incidence of COVID-19 -- showing that our methodology generates interpretable results, is useful for tracking model performance, and can boost model performance through refitting. We complement these empirical results with theory proving that our methodology is minimax optimal for recovering anomalous subpopulations as well as refitting to improve accuracy in a structured normal means setting.