跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接围绕观察性研究的平均处理效应、未测混杂和敏感性界限展开,因此归入因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chengyao Tang
Yi Zhou
Ao Huang
Satoshi Hattori

利用估计方程约束与线性规划开展未测混杂敏感性分析

研究问题
观察性研究中,未测混杂和倾向得分模型误设可能扭曲平均处理效应;如何减少参数模型依赖并评估最坏情形?
方法与思路
作者保留真实倾向得分渐近满足的估计方程作为约束,移除限制性参数模型设定,用线性规划构造效应界限。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法在较少假设下构造平均处理效应的最坏情形界限,并通过模拟和真实案例展示敏感性分析用途。
阅读关注点
应核对可行倾向得分集合、敏感性限制及估计方程的依据,并检查总体界限、样本计算与统计不确定性的关系。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未经核实;摘要未列明所谓最少假设,不能理解为无需假设即可识别效应。

原文摘要

In estimating the average treatment effect in observational studies, the influence of confounders should be appropriately addressed. To this end, the propensity score is widely used. If the propensity scores are known for all the subjects, bias due to confounders can be adjusted by using the inverse probability weighting (IPW) by the propensity score. Since the propensity score is unknown in general, it is usually estimated by the parametric logistic regression model with unknown parameters estimated by solving the score equation under the strongly ignorable treatment assignment (SITA) assumption. Violation of the SITA assumption and/or misspecification of the propensity score model can cause serious bias in estimating the average treatment effect. To relax the SITA assumption, the IPW estimator based on the outcome-dependent propensity score has been successfully introduced. However, it still depends on the correctly specified parametric model and its identification. In this paper, we propose a simple sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounders. In the standard practice, the estimating equation is used to estimate the unknown parameters in the parametric propensity score model. Our idea is to make inference on the average causal effect by removing restrictive parametric model assumptions while still utilizing the estimating equation. Using estimating equations as constraints, which the true propensity scores asymptotically satisfy, we construct the worst-case bounds for the average treatment effect with linear programming. Different from the existing sensitivity analysis methods, we construct the worst-case bounds with minimal assumptions. We illustrate our proposal by simulation studies and a real-world example.

笔记与分组