跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要针对依据个体特征分配二元处理的政策学习,以福利和遗憾衡量决策表现,直接对应因果推断中的处理选择问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Eric Mbakop
Max Tabord-Meehan

处理选择中的模型选择:惩罚化福利最大化

研究问题
当政策制定者依据个体可观测特征分配二元处理时,如何在不同复杂度的可行政策类之间选择,并控制相对最优政策的福利损失?
方法与思路
作者把处理分配表述为统计决策问题,对不同受限政策类实施惩罚化福利最大化,借助统计学习结果分析遗憾,并讨论分样本选择。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所提规则满足遗憾的预言机不等式,可据此推导最大遗憾界,并为先用半样本估计政策、再用另一半选择的程序提供理论依据。
阅读关注点
核对福利目标、处理效果识别所需条件、政策类复杂度与惩罚项的定义,并查看遗憾比较基准及分样本选择保证的适用范围。
阅读边界
摘要未说明样本中处理分配的生成机制、因果识别条件及惩罚项细节;所述遗憾界不能直接等同于任意样本中的福利提升。

原文摘要

This paper studies a penalized statistical decision rule for the treatment assignment problem. Consider the setting of a utilitarian policy maker who must use sample data to allocate a binary treatment to members of a population, based on their observable characteristics. We model this problem as a statistical decision problem where the policy maker must choose a subset of the covariate space to assign to treatment, out of a class of potential subsets. We focus on settings in which the policy maker may want to select amongst a collection of constrained subset classes: examples include choosing the number of covariates over which to perform best‐subset selection, and model selection when approximating a complicated class via a sieve. We adapt and extend results from statistical learning to develop the Penalized Welfare Maximization (PWM) rule. We establish an oracle inequality for the regret of the PWM rule which shows that it is able to perform model selection over the collection of available classes. We then use this oracle inequality to derive relevant bounds on maximum regret for PWM. An important consequence of our results is that we are able to formalize model‐selection using a “holdout” procedure, where the policy maker would first estimate various policies using half of the data, and then select the policy which performs the best when evaluated on the other half of the data.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文