Testing for principal component directions under weak identifiability

We consider the problem of testing, on the basis of a $p$ -variate Gaussian random sample, the null hypothesis $\mathcal{H}_{0}:\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}=\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}^{0}$ against the alternative $\mathcal{H}_{1}:\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}\neq \boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}^{0}$ , where $\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}$ is the “first” eigenvector of the underlying covariance matrix and $\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}^{0}$ is a fixed unit $p$ -vector. In the classical setup where eigenvalues $\lambda_{1}>\lambda_{2}\geq \cdots \geq \lambda_{p}$ are fixed, the Anderson (Ann. Math. Stat. 34 (1963) 122–148) likelihood ratio test (LRT) and the Hallin, Paindaveine and Verdebout (Ann. Statist. 38 (2010) 3245–3299) Le Cam optimal test for this problem are asymptotically equivalent under the null hypothesis, hence also under sequences of contiguous alternatives. We show that this equivalence does not survive asymptotic scenarios where $\lambda_{n1}/\lambda_{n2}=1+O(r_{n})$ with $r_{n}=O(1/\sqrt{n})$ . For such scenarios, the Le Cam optimal test still asymptotically meets the nominal level constraint, whereas the LRT severely overrejects the null hypothesis. Consequently, the former test should be favored over the latter one whenever the two largest sample eigenvalues are close to each other. By relying on the Le Cam’s asymptotic theory of statistical experiments, we study the non-null and optimality properties of the Le Cam optimal test in the aforementioned asymptotic scenarios and show that the null robustness of this test is not obtained at the expense of power. Our asymptotic investigation is extensive in the sense that it allows $r_{n}$ to converge to zero at an arbitrary rate. While we restrict to single-spiked spectra of the form $\lambda_{n1}>\lambda_{n2}=\cdots =\lambda_{np}$ to make our results as striking as possible, we extend our results to the more general elliptical case. Finally, we present an illustrative real data example.We consider the problem of testing, on the basis of a $p$-variate Gaussian random sample, the null hypothesis $\mathcal{H}_{0}:\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}=\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}^{0}$ against the alternative $\mathcal{H}_{1}:\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}\neq \boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}^{0}$, where $\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}$ is the “first” eigenvector of the underlying covariance matrix and $\boldsymbol{\theta}_{1}^{0}$ is a fixed unit $p$-vector. In the classical setup where eigenvalues $\lambda_{1}>\lambda_{2}\geq \cdots \geq \lambda_{p}$ are fixed, the Anderson (Ann. Math. Stat. 34 (1963) 122–148) likelihood ratio test (LRT) and the Hallin, Paindaveine and Verdebout (Ann. Statist. 38 (2010) 3245–3299) Le Cam optimal test for this problem are asymptotically equivalent under the null hypothesis, hence also under sequences of contiguous alternatives. We show that this equivalence does not survive asymptotic scenarios where $\lambda_{n1}/\lambda_{n2}=1+O(r_{n})$ with $r_{n}=O(1/\sqrt{n})$. For such scenarios, the Le Cam optimal test still asymptotically meets the nominal level constraint, whereas the LRT severely overrejects the null hypothesis. Consequently, the former test should be favored over the latter one whenever the two largest sample eigenvalues are close to each other. By relying on the Le Cam’s asymptotic theory of statistical experiments, we study the non-null and optimality properties of the Le Cam optimal test in the aforementioned asymptotic scenarios and show that the null robustness of this test is not obtained at the expense of power. Our asymptotic investigation is extensive in the sense that it allows $r_{n}$ to converge to zero at an arbitrary rate. While we restrict to single-spiked spectra of the form $\lambda_{n1}>\lambda_{n2}=\cdots =\lambda_{np}$ to make our results as striking as possible, we extend our results to the more general elliptical case. Finally, we present an illustrative real data example.

摘要来源：OpenAlex 索引摘要（稿件版本未注明）

笔记与分组

分类依据与纠错

Testing for principal component directions under weak identifiability

代码、数据与补充材料

弱可识别性下的主成分方向检验

原文摘要

同方向的基础文献

同方向的基础文献