跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究网络块模型、社区结构及环计数拟合检验,与给定的网络方向相关,但并未讨论因果干扰效应。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jiashun Jin
Zheng Tracy Ke
Jiajun Tang
Jingming Wang

块模型家族的网络拟合优度检验

研究问题
如何检验常见块模型对真实网络的适配程度,并在大量未知网络参数存在时构造具有可用零假设分布的统计量?
方法与思路
作者结合环计数统计量与新的网络拟合方案,为 DCMM 构造 GoF-MSCORE,并扩展至另外三类常见块模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称四类检验在模型正确时均收敛至标准正态分布,并在多种设定下具有最优功效;真实网络比较支持 DCMM 的适配性。
阅读关注点
应核对网络稀疏度、节点异质性和社区结构条件,以及拟合误差如何进入环统计量、功效最优性针对哪些备择。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要。具体渐近条件和最优性范围未说明;有限网络中拟合良好不证明模型为真或普遍适用。

原文摘要

The block-model family has four popular network models (SBM, DCBM, MMSBM, and DCMM). A fundamental problem is, how well each of these models fits with real networks. We propose GoF-MSCORE as a new Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) metric for DCMM (the broadest one among the four), with two main ideas. The first is to use cycle count statistics as a general recipe for GoF. The second is a novel network fitting scheme. GoF-MSCORE is a flexible GoF approach, and we further extend it to SBM, DCBM, and MMSBM. This gives rise to a series of GoF metrics covering each of the four models in the block-model family.We show that for each of the four models, if the assumed model is correct, then the corresponding GoF metric converges to N(0,1) as the network sizes diverge. We also analyze the powers and show that these metrics are optimal in many settings. In comparison, many other GoF ideas face challenges: they may lack a parameter-free limiting null, or are non-optimal in power, or face an analytical hurdle. Note that a parameter-free limiting null is especially desirable as many network models have a large number of unknown parameters. The limiting nulls of our GoF metrics are always N(0,1), which are parameter-free as desired.For 12 frequently-used real networks, we use the proposed GoF metrics to show that DCMM fits well with almost all of them. We also show that SBM, DCBM, and MMSBM do not fit well with many of these networks, especially when the networks are relatively large. To complement with our study on GoF, we also show that the DCMM is nearly as broad as the rank-K network model. Based on these results, we recommend the DCMM as a promising model for undirected networks.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文