跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论生存模型的风险函数拟合检验,未提供归入指定经济计量细分的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Edsel A. Peña

Cox 比例风险模型基准风险的平滑拟合优度检验

研究问题
在数据不完整时,如何检验 Cox 模型的基准风险是否等于指定函数,并正确使用广义残差开展模型验证?
方法与思路
作者通过平滑且可由数据驱动的变换扩展风险函数族,构造得分检验,并将方向性检验组合为综合检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架产生多类拟合优度检验,提供有限样本与渐近性质,并指出使用广义残差所需的理论调整。
阅读关注点
应核对数据驱动备择如何影响检验分布、删失及参数估计的处理,以及方向检验合并和残差调整的具体规则。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;未列出完整检验条件与医学数据结果,不能把基准风险检验当作整个 Cox 模型的充分验证。

原文摘要

For the Cox proportional hazards model, the goodness-of-fit problem of testing whether the baseline hazard rate function λ(·) equals some specified hazard rate function λ0(·) in the presence of incomplete data is considered. Extending Neyman's idea, the goodness-of-fit tests are score tests obtained by embedding λ(·) in a larger family of hazard rate functions developed through smooth and possibly random transformations of λ0(·). But whereas their smooth alternatives were formulated through the density function, my formulation is through the hazard rate function, which is more natural in failure time models where model specification is now done through hazard rates. Furthermore, my smooth alternatives are allowed to be data driven or dynamic. Through this machinery, classes of omnibus, as well as directional goodness-of-fit tests are obtained. Moreover, this machinery provides a theoretically sound method for combining varied directional goodness-of-fit tests into omnibus tests. Some of the resulting tests are specialized to the randomly censored model. Finite and asymptotic properties of the resulting tests are presented. The asymptotic results shed light into properties of generalized residuals typically used in model validation and diagnostics. The theoretical results indicate the adjustments that need to be made to properly use these residuals for goodness of fit and model validation. Two medical datasets are reanalyzed using the proposed procedures.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文