Smooth Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Baseline Hazard in Cox's Proportional Hazards Model
Cox 比例风险模型基准风险的平滑拟合优度检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论生存模型的风险函数拟合检验,未提供归入指定经济计量细分的直接证据。
反馈分类问题Cox 比例风险模型基准风险的平滑拟合优度检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
For the Cox proportional hazards model, the goodness-of-fit problem of testing whether the baseline hazard rate function λ(·) equals some specified hazard rate function λ0(·) in the presence of incomplete data is considered. Extending Neyman's idea, the goodness-of-fit tests are score tests obtained by embedding λ(·) in a larger family of hazard rate functions developed through smooth and possibly random transformations of λ0(·). But whereas their smooth alternatives were formulated through the density function, my formulation is through the hazard rate function, which is more natural in failure time models where model specification is now done through hazard rates. Furthermore, my smooth alternatives are allowed to be data driven or dynamic. Through this machinery, classes of omnibus, as well as directional goodness-of-fit tests are obtained. Moreover, this machinery provides a theoretically sound method for combining varied directional goodness-of-fit tests into omnibus tests. Some of the resulting tests are specialized to the randomly censored model. Finite and asymptotic properties of the resulting tests are presented. The asymptotic results shed light into properties of generalized residuals typically used in model validation and diagnostics. The theoretical results indicate the adjustments that need to be made to properly use these residuals for goodness of fit and model validation. Two medical datasets are reanalyzed using the proposed procedures.