跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究线性时间序列的自回归近似、筛法 bootstrap 与置信域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Edwin Choi
Peter Hall

基于任意阶自回归计算的 bootstrap 置信域

研究问题
对可由有限阶自回归近似的线性时间序列,如何构造准确的置信域,并减少方差估计和阶数选择带来的困难?
方法与思路
作者以有限阶自回归近似实施筛法 bootstrap,并用第二层 bootstrap 校准基本百分位区间,讨论百分位 t 方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称筛法 bootstrap 具有二阶正确性,双重校准可无需估计方差而获得二阶精度,并报告相对分块方法的优势。
阅读关注点
应核对线性过程与目标统计量的条件、自回归阶数增长规则、二阶精度的定义,以及与分块方法比较的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,不能判定优势是否适用于非线性过程或所有统计量,也无法核验具体覆盖误差及调参表现。

原文摘要

Summary Given a linear time series, e.g. an autoregression of infinite order, we may construct a finite order approximation and use that as the basis for confidence regions. The sieve or autoregressive bootstrap, as this method is often called, is generally seen as a competitor with the better-understood block bootstrap approach. However, in the present paper we argue that, for linear time series, the sieve bootstrap has significantly better performance than blocking methods and offers a wider range of opportunities. In particular, since it does not corrupt second-order properties then it may be used in a double-bootstrap form, with the second bootstrap application being employed to calibrate a basic percentile method confidence interval. This approach confers second-order accuracy without the need to estimate variance. That offers substantial benefits, since variances of statistics based on time series can be difficult to estimate reliably, and—partly because of the relatively small amount of information contained in a dependent process—are notorious for causing problems when used to Studentize. Other advantages of the sieve bootstrap include considerably greater robustness against variations in the choice of the tuning parameter, here equal to the autoregressive order, and the fact that, in contradistinction to the case of the block bootstrap, the percentile t version of the sieve bootstrap may be based on the ‘raw'’ estimator of standard error. In the process of establishing these properties we show that the sieve bootstrap is second order correct.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文