跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究宏观数据因子提取及其实时预测用途。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jean Boivin
Serena Ng

因子分析中更多数据总是更好吗?

研究问题
扩大宏观数据集是否可能使估计因子更不适合预测,特异误差的横截面相关与因子在不同变量组中的主导程度如何影响这一结果?
方法与思路
作者结合实时预测与模拟,比较预筛选和完整数据集的因子预测表现,并研究数据加权、特异误差相关及分组因子载荷差异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称更多序列可能降低因子的预测价值;应用中约四十条预筛选序列常可达到或超过全部一百四十七条序列的表现,加权也改善预测。
阅读关注点
核对序列筛选是否仅使用当时信息、实时数据处理、加权规则,以及相关特异误差与因子载荷异质性如何影响主成分和预测评价。
阅读边界
依据所给作者/机构库版本摘要,不能推断刊本变化;摘要未给出筛选细节及改善幅度,所述序列数量不能视为普遍最优的数据规模。

原文摘要

Factors estimated from large macroeconomic panels are being used in an increasing number of applications. However, little is known about how the size and the composition of the data affect the factor estimates. In this paper, we question whether it is possible to use more series to extract the factors, and yet the resulting factors are less useful for forecasting, and the answer is yes. Such a problem tends to arise when the idiosyncratic errors are cross-correlated. It can also arise if forecasting power is provided by a factor that is dominant in a small dataset but is a dominated factor in a larger dataset. In a real time forecasting exercise, we find that factors extracted from as few as 40 pre-screened series often yield satisfactory or even better results than using all 147 series. Weighting the data by their properties when constructing the factors also lead to improved forecasts. Our simulation analysis is unique in that special attention is paid to cross-correlated idiosyncratic errors, and we also allow the factors to have stronger loadings on some groups of series than others. It thus allows us to better understand the properties of the principal components estimator in empirical applications.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文