Properties of Hazard-Based Residuals and Implications in Model Diagnostics
基于风险率的残差性质及其对模型诊断的影响AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究生存模型的残差诊断,未涉及所列金融风险或其他领域细分。
反馈分类问题基于风险率的残差性质及其对模型诊断的影响AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Model diagnostic procedures in failure time models using hazard-based residuals rely on the assumption that the residual vector closely resembles a random sample from a unit exponential distribution when the model holds. This article formally investigates the validity of this critical assumption by deriving and examining the properties of parametrically, semiparametrically, and nonparametrically estimated residuals for complete and right-censored data. The joint distribution of the residual vector is characterized, and the behavior of some tests for exponentiality when applied to the residuals is examined analytically and through Monte Carlo methods. Findings reveal that the critical assumption of approximate unit exponentiality of the residual vector may not be viable and, consequently, the model diagnostic procedures considered, which revolve on checking the approximate unit exponentiality of the residual vector (specifically, hazard plotting and the use of spacings and total-time-on-test statistics on the residual vector) may have serious defects. This is especially evident in situations where the failure time distribution is not exponential or when the residuals are obtained nonparametrically in the no-covariate model or semiparametrically in the Cox proportional hazards model.