跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要通过个体内比较控制固定混杂,并修正事件依赖观察期对暴露效应估计的影响,与因果推断方法相关。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mounia N. Hocine
Ian Douglas
Liam Smeeth

观察期依赖事件时的自控病例系列分析

研究问题
当健康事件提高死亡率、导致观察期终止依赖事件时间时,如何修正自控病例系列分析,并估计时变暴露与事件的关系?
方法与思路
作者针对罕见且不重复事件,在似然中加入删失过程项,再通过重参数化,利用事件至观察结束的间隔分布估计该项。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称扩展模型可无偏估计暴露效应,但年龄效应含义发生变化;抗精神病药与卒中应用显示,忽略事件依赖观察期会产生偏差。
阅读关注点
应核对删失过程的模型限制、仅抽取病例时的可估性、年龄效应的新解释,以及标准软件所得保守标准误的依据。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;固定混杂控制并不足以证明因果识别,暴露效应无偏所需完整条件未说明。

原文摘要

The self-controlled case series method may be used to study the association between a time-varying exposure and a health event. It is based only on cases, and it controls for fixed confounders. Exposure and event histories are collected for each case over a predefined observation period. The method requires that observation periods should be independent of event times. This requirement is violated when events increase the mortality rate, since censoring of the observation periods is then event dependent. In this article, the case series method for rare nonrecurrent events is extended to remove this independence assumption, thus introducing an additional term in the likelihood that depends on the censoring process. In order to remain within the case series framework in which only cases are sampled, the model is reparameterized so that this additional term becomes estimable from the distribution of intervals from event to end of observation. The exposure effect of primary interest may be estimated unbiasedly. The age effect, however, takes on a new interpretation, incorporating the effect of censoring. The model may be fitted in standard loglinear modeling software; this yields conservative standard errors. We describe a detailed application to the study of antipsychotics and stroke. The estimates obtained from the standard case series model are shown to be biased when event-dependent observation periods are ignored. When they are allowed for, antipsychotic use remains strongly positively associated with stroke in patients with dementia, but not in patients without dementia. Two detailed simulation studies are included as Supplemental Material.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文