Data Base Error Trapping and Prediction
数据库错误检测与预测AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论数据库质量管理和错误数预测,未提供所列经济计量细分方向的直接依据。
反馈分类问题数据库错误检测与预测AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We develop and analyze models for a class of problems involving inferences about uncertain numbers of errors in data bases. In particular, we study two error detection methods. In the duplicate performance method, all items in a data base are processed by two individuals (or machines), and the resulting records are compared to find disagreements, which are then resolved. In the known errors method, a data base is first extended to include additional items known to be in error, and then the extended data base is checked by a single individual. For both methods, we lay out the underlying structure of the model and generate inferences in terms of predictive distributions for the numbers of undetected errors. The role of prior information is important in these problems of data base quality management. In the first method of error checking, for example, observed data are always equally consistent with small error rates and few remaining errors and with high error rates and many remaining errors. Most of our illustrative analyses use fairly conservative prior specifications, and the results are compared with those in the less formal development of Strayhorn. In practice, of course, appropriately realistic priors should be used, and some possibilities are mentioned. Models of the type studied here are applicable in a wide variety of important practical problems in data quality management, with examples in industrial quality control and reliability control being of particular note.