Two-Sided Prioritized Ranking: A Coherency-Preserving Design for Marketplace Experiments
双侧优先排序:保持平台一致性的市场实验设计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究商品间干扰条件下的随机实验设计与总体平均处理效应估计。
双侧优先排序:保持平台一致性的市场实验设计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Online marketplaces frequently run pricing experiments in environments where users choose from a list of items. In these settings, items compete for users' limited attention and demand, creating interference among items within a list: Changing prices for any item can affect the demand for others, biasing estimates from item-level A/B tests. Besides, a key consideration in pricing experiments is preserving platform coherency across prices and item availability. This requirement rules out experimental designs such as user-level A/B tests as they violate platform coherency. We propose Two-Sided Prioritized Ranking (TSPR) to estimate the total average treatment effect of price changes in such settings. TSPR exploits position bias in ranked search results to create variation in treatment exposure without compromising coherency. TSPR randomizes both users and items and reorders ranked lists, prioritizing treated items for one group of users and untreated items for the other. All users see the same items at consistent prices, but differ in exposure to treatment as they pay disproportionate attention across ranks. In semi-synthetic simulations based on Expedia hotel search data, TSPR outperforms baseline coherency-preserving experiment designs by reducing estimation bias and providing sufficient statistical power.