Penalized balanced sampling
惩罚平衡抽样AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本核心是调查抽样设计与通用混合模型效率,未明确涉及给定的经济学领域细分,不能因提及时间型模型而归入宏观时间序列。
惩罚平衡抽样AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Linear mixed models cover a wide range of statistical methods, which have found many uses in the estimation for complex surveys. The purpose of this work is to consider methods by which linear mixed models may be used at the design stage of a survey to incorporate available auxiliary information. This paper reviews the ideas of balanced sampling and the cube algorithm, and proposes an implementation of the latter by which penalized balanced samples can be selected. Such samples can reduce or eliminate the need for linear mixed model weight adjustments, a result demonstrated theoretically and via simulation. Horvitz–Thompson estimators for such samples will be highly efficient for any responses well approximated by a linear mixed model in the auxiliary information. In Monte Carlo experiments using nonparametric and temporal linear mixed models, the strategy of penalized balanced sampling with Horvitz–Thompson estimation dominates a variety of standard strategies.