跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用潜变量模型的拟合检验,出现有序变量不足以认定为离散选择,亦未说明宏观或金融因子模型。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David Conne
Elvezio Ronchetti

广义线性潜变量模型的拟合优度检验

研究问题
面对有序、离散和连续显变量混合的广义线性潜变量模型,如何构造适用范围较广的拟合优度统计量并计算其显著性?
方法与思路
作者以潜变量得分与原始数据之间的距离比较构造拟合优度指标,考虑各显变量类型,并以修改的参数自助法计算 p 值。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该指标原则上适用于多种显变量组合,所提重抽样方法具有一致性,模拟中检验水平与功效表现良好。
阅读关注点
读全文应核对距离指标如何依变量类型定义、潜变量得分的估计方式,以及重抽样一致性条件和不同模型下的检验表现。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;距离定义、一致性条件及模拟细节未提供,不能认定指标适用于所有潜变量模型。

原文摘要

Generalized Linear Latent Variables Models (GLLVM) enable the modeling of relationships between manifest and latent variables, where the manifest variables are distributed according to a distribution of the exponential family (e.g., binomial or normal) and to the multinomial distribution (for ordinal manifest variables). These models are widely used in social sciences. To test the appropriateness of a particular model, one needs to define a goodness-of-fit test statistic (GFI). In the normal case, one can use a likelihood ratio test or a modified version proposed by Satorra and Bentler (2001) (S&B GFI) that compares the sample covariance matrix to the estimated covariance matrix induced by the model. In the binary case, Pearson-type test statistics can be used if the number of observations is sufficiently large. In the other cases, including the case of mixed types of manifest variables, there exists GFI based on a comparison between a pseudo sample covariance and the model covariance of the manifest variables. These types of GFI are based on latent variable models that suppose that the manifest variables are themselves induced by underlying normal variables (underlying variable approach). The pseudo sample covariance matrices are then made of polychoric, tetrachoric or polyserial correlations. In this article, we propose an alternative GFI that is more generally applicable. It is based on some distance comparison between the latent scores and the original data. This GFI takes into account the nature of each manifest variable and can in principle be applied in various situations and in particular with models with ordinal, and both discrete and continuous manifest variables. To compute the p-value associated to our GFI, we propose a consistent resampling technique that can be viewed as a modified parametric bootstrap. A simulation study shows that our GFI has good performance in terms of empirical level and empirical power across different models with different types of manifest variables. This article has supplementary material online.

笔记与分组