跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕分组生存数据的拟合优度检验,未明确对应用户给定的经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Terence J. O'Neill

单样本寿命表数据的拟合优度检验

研究问题
对分组且存在删失的寿命表数据,如何检验假定生存曲线的拟合,并减少对删失边际分布的限制。
方法与思路
作者在给定无删失死亡概率的约束下,估计区间内死亡或删失概率,再构造最大似然拟合检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称部分既有检验放宽条件后可能失去正确水平,新检验无需限制删失边际分布,但可能损失功效。
阅读关注点
核对所谓最小条件仍包含哪些要求、分组删失的似然构造,以及检验水平与功效比较的具体设定。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;不限制删失边际分布不等于不需要其他条件,摘要未说明完整假设与检验分布。

原文摘要

Grouped censored data are common in life testing, medical trials, and other fields. Individuals, subject to a disease, have their lifetimes recorded as belonging to a certain interval. If the individuals are censored or removed before death, then it is only known that their lifetimes were at least as great as the beginning of the interval in which the individuals were censored. A goodness-of-fit problem is to test the agreement of a hypothesized survival curve with the observed data. Several tests have been proposed in the literature that require various assumptions about the censoring distribution. It is shown in this article that if these conditions are relaxed, then the tests may no longer have the stated properties, such as the correct size. To derive a test under minimal conditions, the maximum likelihood estimates of the probability of death or censoring in an interval are found, given that the probability of death in the absence of censoring is a certain quantity. The estimates are used to construct the maximum likelihood test of the fit of the postulated survival curve. The test does not require any assumptions about the censoring marginal distribution. If the assumptions for the more specific tests hold, however, then there may be some loss of power.

笔记与分组