Testing for Threshold Autoregression
阈值自回归检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究平稳时间序列的自回归与阈值自回归检验,直接对应时间序列方向。
阈值自回归检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We consider the problem of determining whether a threshold autoregressive model fits a stationary time series significantly better than an autoregressive model does. A test statistic $\lambda$ which is equivalent to the (conditional) likelihood ratio test statistic when the noise is normally distributed is proposed. Essentially, $\lambda$ is the normalized reduction in sum of squares due to the piecewise linearity of the autoregressive function. It is shown that, under certain regularity conditions, the asymptotic null distribution of $\lambda$ is given by a functional of a central Gaussian process, i.e., with zero mean function. Contiguous alternative hypotheses are then considered. The asymptotic distribution of $\lambda$ under the contiguous alternative is shown to be given by the same functional of a noncentral Gaussian process. These results are then illustrated with a special case of the test, in which case the asymptotic distribution of $\lambda$ is related to a Brownian bridge.