跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究协整回归、序列相关误差及近单位根渐近行为,属于时间序列计量。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Eiji Kurozumi
Kazuhiko Hayakawa

序列相关误差下协整回归有效估计量的渐近性质

研究问题
当协整回归误差的自回归系数趋近于一时,三类有效估计量的极限分布与效率如何随趋近速度变化?
方法与思路
作者分析完全修正最小二乘、典型协整回归与动态最小二乘,考虑误差自回归系数以慢于样本量倒数的速度趋近一。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,趋近速度决定效率修正的作用;作者据此提出进一步消除二阶偏差的修改,并以模拟考察其效果。
阅读关注点
应核对不同趋近速度区间的精确定义、效率比较的标准,以及修改估计量消除二阶偏差所需的条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断速度阈值、修正公式及模拟改善幅度;效果描述限于摘要所述误差相关情形。

原文摘要

In this paper, we analytically investigate three efficient estimators for cointegrating regression models: Phillips and Hansen's [Phillips, P.C.B., Hansen, B.E., 1990. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies 57, 99-125] fully modified OLS estimator, Park's [Park, J.Y., 1992. Canonical cointegrating regressions. Econometrica 60, 119-143] canonical cointegrating regression estimator, and Saikkonen's [Saikkonen, P., 1991. Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegration regressions. Econometric Theory 7, 1-21] dynamic OLS estimator. We consider the case where the regression errors are moderately serially correlated and the AR coefficient in the regression errors approaches 1 at a rate slower than 1/T, where T represents the sample size. We derive the limiting distributions of the efficient estimators under this system and find that they depend on the approaching rate of the AR coefficient. If the rate is slow enough, efficiency is established for the three estimators; however, if the approaching rate is relatively faster, the estimators will have the same limiting distribution as the OLS estimator. For the intermediate case, the second-order bias of the OLS estimator is partially eliminated by the efficient methods. This result explains why, in finite samples, the effect of the efficient methods diminishes as the serial correlation in the regression errors becomes stronger. We also propose to modify the existing efficient estimators in order to eliminate the second-order bias, which possibly remains in the efficient estimators. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we demonstrate that our modification is effective when the regression errors are moderately serially correlated and the simultaneous correlation is relatively strong.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文