A Bayesian Analysis of Body Mass Index Data From Small Domains Under Nonignorable Nonresponse and Selection
不可忽略无应答与抽样选择下小域 BMI 数据的贝叶斯分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以小域总体 BMI 百分位数及不同群体的分布差异为估计目标。
不可忽略无应答与抽样选择下小域 BMI 数据的贝叶斯分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Here we analyze body mass index (BMI) data for children and adolescents from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Because of the lack of BMI values for a considerable number of the children and adolescents, and the differential probabilities of selection of these individuals, serious nonresponse and selection bias in inference can be present. To analyze the NHANES III BMI data, a nonignorable nonresponse model has been proposed to estimate the finite population means of small domains formed by crossing age, race and sex within counties. In this approach, the log-BMI values are used to obtain more normally distributed data, and the model includes a spline regression of log-BMI on age, adjusted for race, sex, and the interaction of race and sex. In this work, to assess the status of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents, our new model predicts the more informative finite population percentiles of BMI for these small domains, incorporating additional measures to minimize possible biases. These measures are the most appropriate transformation for the skewed BMI data, incorporation of an intraclass correlation within the households, and inclusion of selection probabilities into the nonignorable nonresponse model to reflect the higher probabilities of selection among black non-Hispanics and Hispanic-Americans. We also consider robustness and sensitivity to the assumptions of the nonignorable nonresponse model by fitting several versions of our proposed model, as well as a very different ignorable nonresponse model that uses a mixture of Student t densities, selection probabilities, and BMI values. It is noteworthy that in the likelihood-based inference literature, we have seen no work by others that includes both nonignorable nonresponse and nonignorable selection. Based on NHANES III data, we show that there are differences in the 85th or 95th percentile for overweight by county, race, and particularly age, and a small difference in sex.