跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究文本处理的平均处理效应识别、双重机器学习及工具变量扩展,属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kosuke Imai
Kentaro Nakamura

生成式人工智能辅助因果推断:以文本作为处理

研究问题
文本等高维非结构化处理包含未知混杂特征时,如何利用生成模型的内部表征识别目标特征的因果效应,并处理人类感知特征?
方法与思路
作者用生成模型产生处理并利用其内部表征估计效应,结合双重机器学习推导性质,再以工具变量方法扩展到人类感知特征。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立平均处理效应的非参数识别条件,提出避免重叠违背的估计策略,并用Llama 3文本实验及实证展示方法优势。
阅读关注点
应核对内部表征如何分离目标与混杂特征、识别和重叠条件,以及人类感知扩展所需的工具变量条件与文本再生成机制。
阅读边界
仅据所给OpenAlex摘要版本,不能推断后续刊本变化。摘要未列具体识别假设;使用生成模型内部表征本身不构成无混杂保证。

原文摘要

In this paper, we demonstrate how to enhance the validity of causal inference with unstructured high-dimensional treatments like texts, by leveraging the power of generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI). Specifically, we propose to use a deep generative model such as large language models (LLMs) to efficiently generate treatments and use their internal representation for subsequent causal effect estimation. We show that the knowledge of this true internal representation helps disentangle the treatment features of interest, such as specific sentiments and certain topics, from other possibly unknown confounding features. Unlike existing methods, the proposed GenAI-Powered Inference (GPI) methodology eliminates the need to learn representation directly from the data, and hence produces more accurate and efficient estimates. We formally establish the conditions required for the nonparametric identification of the average treatment effect, propose an estimation strategy that avoids the violation of the overlap assumption, and derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimator through the application of double machine learning. Finally, using an instrumental variables approach, we extend the proposed GPI methodology to the settings in which the treatment feature is based on human perception. The GPI is also applicable to text reuse where an LLM is used to regenerate existing texts. We conduct simulation and empirical studies, using the generated text data from an open-source LLM, Llama 3, to illustrate the advantages of our estimator over state-of-the-art representation learning algorithms. An open-source software package is available for implementing the proposed GPI methodology.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文