跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用序贯试验的停止规则与样本量校准,未明确涉及处理效应识别等所列细分主题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Luke Hagar
Shirin Golchi
Marina B. Klein

基于后验与后验预测概率的组序贯设计

研究问题
在采用后验或后验预测概率进行提前停止的组序贯设计中,如何高效校准决策阈值与最小样本量,使错误概率满足预设控制目标?
方法与思路
作者建立后验及后验预测概率随样本量变化的函数表示,利用两个样本量下的模拟评估更广范围的错误概率并校准支出函数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,理论结果支持跨样本量建模,从而减少逐个样本量开展大量模拟的需求,并用于确定阈值与最小样本量。
阅读关注点
应核对概率函数表示的条件与精度、两次模拟的信息如何外推,以及序贯观察时点、先验设定和错误概率支出函数的配合。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 版本摘要;具体模型、近似误差与计算节约幅度未说明,不能据此认为任意贝叶斯序贯设计都仅需两次模拟。

原文摘要

Group sequential designs drive innovation in clinical, industrial, and corporate settings. Early stopping for failure in sequential designs conserves experimental resources, whereas early stopping for success accelerates access to improved interventions. Bayesian decision procedures provide a formal and intuitive framework for early stopping using posterior and posterior predictive probabilities. Design parameters including decision thresholds and sample sizes are chosen to control the error probabilities associated with the sequential decision process. These choices are routinely made based on estimating the sampling distribution of posterior summaries via intensive Monte Carlo simulations for each sample size and design scenario considered. In this paper, we propose an efficient method to calibrate decision thresholds to pre-specified alpha- and beta-spending functions and determine minimum sample sizes for Bayesian group sequential designs. We prove theoretical results that enable posterior and posterior predictive probabilities to be modeled as a function of the sample size. Using these functions, we assess error probabilities at a range of sample sizes given simulations conducted at only two sample sizes. The effectiveness of our methodology is highlighted using several substantive examples.

笔记与分组