跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究随机处理分配下平均处理效应的设计型方差估计与实验推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yuehao Bai
Xun Huang
Joseph P. Romano
Azeem M. Shaikh
Max Tabord-Meehan

细分层实验的新设计型方差估计量

研究问题
在每层规模固定、甚至仅有一个处理或对照单位的细分层实验中,如何估计均值差的设计型方差并改进推断精度?
方法与思路
作者通过配对相邻分层构造方差估计量,分析有限总体下的向上偏差,并用总体一次独立抽样的框架比较极限偏差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新估计量在单个处理或对照单位时仍有定义;当相邻层足够相似时,较已有估计量偏差更小,并以模拟展示。
阅读关注点
应核对相邻分层的配对规则、有限总体限制、层间相似性的衡量,以及偏差改善如何转化为区间推断精度。
阅读边界
这是预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未获核实;摘要未列出完整限制,精度优势依赖层间相似性,不能理解为无条件支配。

原文摘要

This paper considers the problem of design-based inference for the average treatment effect in finely stratified experiments. Here, by "design-based'' we mean that the only source of uncertainty stems from the randomness in treatment assignment; by "finely stratified'' we mean that units are stratified into groups of a fixed size according to baseline covariates and then, within each group, a fixed number of units are assigned uniformly at random to treatment and the remainder to control. In this setting we present a novel estimator of the variance of the difference-in-means based on pairing "adjacent" strata. Importantly, our estimator is well defined even in the challenging setting where there is exactly one treated or control unit per stratum. We prove that our estimator is upward-biased, and thus can be used for inference under mild restrictions on the finite population. We compare our estimator with some well-known estimators that have been proposed previously in this setting, and demonstrate that, while these estimators are also upward-biased, our estimator has smaller bias and therefore leads to more precise inferences whenever adjacent strata are sufficiently similar. To further understand when our estimator leads to more precise inferences, we introduce a framework motivated by a thought experiment in which the finite population is modeled as having been drawn once in an i.i.d. fashion from a well-behaved probability distribution. In this framework, we argue that our estimator dominates the others in terms of limiting bias and that these improvements are strict except under strong restrictions on the treatment effects. Finally, we illustrate the practical relevance of our theoretical results through a simulation study, which reveals that our estimator can in fact lead to substantially more precise inferences, especially when the quality of stratification is high.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文