跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以新闻情绪预测个股收益等指标,并专门分析波动率反应,直接对应收益预测与金融波动率方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Junni L. Zhang
Cathy Y. Chen
Elisabeth Bommes

从新闻流中提炼信息以分析股票反应

研究问题
不同词典提炼的新闻情绪能否为股票收益、波动率和成交量提供预测信息,其作用是否随情绪方向、关注度和行业变化?
方法与思路
作者从多类文本来源提炼词典情绪指标,使用一百只标普五百成分股在所述时期的数据,在面板框架中预测股票指标。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新闻情绪含有增量信息,股票反应存在正负情绪不对称、关注度差异与行业差异,且结果随词典投影方式变化。
阅读关注点
应核对文本与市场数据的时间对齐、情绪词典构造、面板设定及预测基准,并检查是否采用样本外评估和避免信息泄漏。
阅读边界
所给OpenAlex摘要未说明识别策略、样本外设计或经济意义大小;所称情绪影响不能直接当作因果效应,也不构成投资建议。

原文摘要

The gargantuan plethora of opinions, facts, and tweets on financial business offers the opportunity to test and analyze the influence of such text sources on future directions of stocks. It also creates though the necessity to distill via statistical technology the informative elements of this prodigious and indeed colossal data source. Using mixed text sources from professional platforms, blog fora, and stock message boards, we distill via different lexica sentiment variables. These are employed for an analysis of stock reactions: volatility, volume, and returns. An increased sentiment, especially for those with negative prospection, will influence volatility as well as volume. This influence is contingent on the lexical projection and different across Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sectors. Based on review articles on 100 S&P 500 constituents for the period of October 20, 2009, to October 13, 2014, we project into BL, MPQA, LM lexica and use the distilled sentiment variables to forecast individual stock indicators in a panel context. Exploiting different lexical projections to test different stock reaction indicators we aim at answering the following research questions: Are the lexica consistent in their analytic ability?To which degree is there an asymmetric response given the sentiment scales (positive v.s. negative)?Are the news of high attention firms diffusing faster and result in more timely and efficient stock reaction?Is there a sector specific reaction from the distilled sentiment measures? We find that there is significant incremental information in the distilled news flow and the sentiment effect is characterized as an asymmetric, attention-specific, and sector-specific response of stock reactions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文