跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本研究删失生存数据的通用秩检验,未明确对应所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

对数秩与广义 Wilcoxon 统计量的上确界版本

研究问题
在存在删失与并列观测的两样本生存比较中,线性秩检验及其上确界版本对不同生存差异的功效和稳定性有何区别?
方法与思路
作者在一般随机删失模型下研究线性秩统计量及 Rényi 型上确界版本的极限分布,并模拟样本规模、删失程度和生存差异。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,对数秩上确界版本保留对比例风险备择的较高敏感性,并覆盖更多非比例风险配置,但重度删失会削弱这一优势。
阅读关注点
应核对随机删失条件、并列值处理与两类统计量的区别,以及联合使用线性秩和上确界统计量时的校准及小样本表现。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体删失条件和功效数值未说明,不能据此断言上确界版本在所有备择下更优。

原文摘要

Considerable progress has been made in generalizing to censored data hypothesis tests based on rank statistics. The most commonly used generalizations are the log-rank test statistic, which extends the Savage exponential scores statistic (Cox 1972; Mantel 1966) and the generalized Wilcoxon statistics (Gehan 1965; Peto and Peto 1972). Gill (1980) showed that in the two-sample problem the asymptotic efficiency properties of the Savage and Wilcoxon statistics are maintained in censored data by the log-rank and Peto and Peto Wilcoxon statistics, respectively, when censoring is the same in both samples. Heuristics and simulations have implied that some recently proposed supremum statistics, closely related to these two popular linear rank statistics, can be used to construct tests that provide good power against a much wider range of nonlocal alternatives (see, e.g., Fleming and Harrington 1981; Fleming, O'Brien, O'Fallon, and Harrington 1980; Gill 1980; Schumacher 1984). In this article we consider new and previously discussed classes of rank statistics that are related to the log-rank and generalized Wilcoxon tests. We focus on linear rank statistics and their Renyi-type supremum versions. These classes are either of the “asymptotically fully efficient” type or the “approximately distribution-free” type discussed by Leurgans (1983). The large sample distributions of these statistics are established for the general setting in which ties can be present in the data. By restricting attention to the general random censorship model, we obtain the asymptotic results by stating and applying a simplified version of Gill's (1980) limit theorems. We examine more thoroughly than in previous literature the relative operating characteristics of these newly and previously proposed censored data rank statistics. Important insights are obtained from simulations performed for small and moderate sample sizes, in equal and unequal sample sizes, and across a range of survival differences and degrees of censorship. For example, results reveal that supremum versions of the log-rank statistic are nearly as sensitive to proportional-hazards alternatives as the efficient log-rank test. In addition, these supremum versions provide greater sensitivity across a wide range of nonproportional-hazards configurations. This increase in power from the supremum statistics is less evident, however, when data are so heavily censored that one can only estimate early survival differences. Another important insight is obtained from the comparison in small samples of asymptotically fully efficient versus approximately distribution-free statistics. Although the former class has received much greater attention, the latter has the desirable property that the types of survival differences detected with highest power are less affected by degree of censorship. In certain circumstances, it would be appealing to apply simultaneously a linear rank statistic and its supremum version. Distributional results are obtained to show how this can be done appropriately and in a very straightforward manner.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文