Sparse recovery under matrix uncertainty
矩阵不确定性下的稀疏恢复AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要是一般高维含误差设计下的稀疏估计理论,未明确关联所列经济计量细分方向。
矩阵不确定性下的稀疏恢复AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We consider the model y = Xθ∗ + ξ, Z = X + Ξ, where the random vector y ∈ ℝn and the random n × p matrix Z are observed, the n × p matrix X is unknown, Ξ is an n × p random noise matrix, ξ ∈ ℝn is a noise independent of Ξ, and θ∗ is a vector of unknown parameters to be estimated. The matrix uncertainty is in the fact that X is observed with additive error. For dimensions p that can be much larger than the sample size n, we consider the estimation of sparse vectors θ∗. Under matrix uncertainty, the Lasso and Dantzig selector turn out to be extremely unstable in recovering the sparsity pattern (i.e., of the set of nonzero components of θ∗), even if the noise level is very small. We suggest new estimators called matrix uncertainty selectors (or, shortly, the MU-selectors) which are close to θ∗ in different norms and in the prediction risk if the restricted eigenvalue assumption on X is satisfied. We also show that under somewhat stronger assumptions, these estimators recover correctly the sparsity pattern.