跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于复杂调查抽样的通用区间理论,均值、回归和分位数示例不足以确定经济计量细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Y. G. Berger

复杂抽样设计下的经验似然置信区间

研究问题
复杂调查抽样下,如何为由估计方程定义的参数构造设计一致的置信区间,并减少对方差估计与重抽样的依赖?
方法与思路
作者将经验似然扩展至复杂调查数据,涵盖多类抽样设计与估计方程,纳入校准约束,并通过模拟比较覆盖表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法无需方差估计、联合入样概率或线性化即可计算区间,支持大抽样比,且模拟中可能获得更好的覆盖率。
阅读关注点
应核对设计一致性的渐近框架、适用抽样设计与估计方程条件、校准约束处理,以及覆盖率比较的具体模拟设置。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要;设计条件、计算细节与覆盖率数值未提供,作者所述简便性和模拟改善不能视为普遍优势。

原文摘要

Summary We define an empirical likelihood approach which gives consistent design-based confidence intervals which can be calculated without the need of variance estimates, designeffects, resampling, joint inclusion probabilities and linearization, even when the point estimator is not linear. It can be used to construct confidence intervals for a large class of sampling designs and estimators which are solutions of estimating equations. It can be used for means, regressions coefficients, quantiles, totals or counts even when the population size is unknown. It can be used with large sampling fractions and naturally includes calibration constraints. It can be viewed as an extension of the empirical likelihood approach to complex survey data. This approach is computationally simpler than the pseudoempirical likelihood and the bootstrap approaches. The simulation study shows that the confidence interval proposed may give better coverages than the confidence intervals based on linearization, bootstrap and pseudoempirical likelihood. Our simulation study shows that, under complex sampling designs, standard confidence intervals based on normality may have poor coverages, because point estimators may not follow a normal sampling distribution and their variance estimators may be biased.

笔记与分组