Calibrating Prediction Regions
预测区域的校准AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要讨论通用预测区域的覆盖校准，没有明确的宏观预测或金融预测对象。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
预测区域的校准
- 研究问题
- 如何同时控制预测区域给定学习样本的条件覆盖率与整体覆盖率，并改善整体覆盖误差的收敛速度及条件覆盖率的波动？
- 方法与思路
- 作者在含未知有限维或无限维参数的联合分布框架中研究预测区域，分析覆盖率的渐近性质，并通常通过自助蒙特卡洛进行校准。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，论文建立条件覆盖率渐近离散程度的下界，并提出加快整体覆盖率收敛的校准方法，且不改变条件覆盖率的一阶极限分布。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对正则模型条件、条件和整体覆盖率的概率含义，以及校准提高收敛速度所需条件，并区分一阶不变与有限样本表现。
- 阅读边界
- 仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要，稿件版本未注明；正则性条件和算法细节未提供，不能将渐近条件覆盖理解为每个学习样本下的精确覆盖。
原文摘要
Suppose that the variable X to be predicted and the learning sample Yn that was observed have a joint distribution, which depends on an unknown parameter θ. The parameter θ can be finite- or infinite-dimensional. A prediction region Dn for X is a random set, depending on Yn , that contains X with prescribed probability α. This article studies methods for controlling simultaneously the conditional coverage proability of Dn , given Yn , and the overall (unconditional) coverage probability of Dn . The basic construction yields a prediction region Dn , which has the following properties in regular models: Both the conditional and overall coverage probabilities of Dn converge to α as the size n of the learning sample increases. The convergence of the former is in probability. Moreover, the asymptotic distribution of the conditional coverage probability about α is typically normal; and the overall coverage probability tends to α at rate n −1. Can one reduce the dispersion of the conditional coverage probability about α and increase the rate at which overall coverage probability converges to α? Both issues are addressed. The article establishes a lower bound for the asymptotic dispersion of conditional coverage probability. The article also shows how to calibrate Dn so as to make its overall coverage probability converge to α at the faster rate n −2. This calibration adjustment does not affect the asymptotic distribution or dispersion of the conditional coverage probability, in a first-order analysis. In general, a bootstrap Monte Carlo algorithm accomplishes the calibration of Dn . In special cases, analytical calibration is possible.