On generalized CCE estimation
广义共同相关效应估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以截面及时间均值处理面板中的共同因子,并应用于生产函数和引力方程,直接对应面板数据方法。
广义共同相关效应估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The widely-used common correlated effects (CCE) estimator, pioneered by Pesaran (2006), is computed using least squares applied to auxiliary regressions where the observed regressors are augmented with cross-sectional averages of the dependent variable and regressors. However, the CCE estimator requires a crucial rank condition and becomes inconsistent when this condition is violated and the factor loadings of the x- and y -equations are correlated, causing an endogeneity issue. This paper proposes a generalized CCE (GCCE) estimator by augmenting the regression with both cross-sectional and time-series averages of the regressors. We argue that the time-series average can serve as “control variables” to address the endogeneity issue. We show that the GCCE and CCE estimators are asymptotically equivalent when the rank condition holds, and the GCCE estimator remains consistent even when the rank condition is violated under our “control variable” condition. Therefore, our GCCE estimator is doubly robust, achieving consistency under either the rank condition or the “control variable” condition. Furthermore, we propose a leave-one-out jackknife method to conduct valid inferences regardless of whether the rank condition holds. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate excellent performance of our estimators and inference methods in finite samples. We apply our new methods to two datasets to estimate the production function and gravity equation.