跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用非参数平滑与带宽选择,提及谱密度扩展不足以确定时间序列等领域归属。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Theo Gasser
Alois Kneip
Walter Köhler

灵活快速的自动平滑方法

研究问题
如何从数据中稳定选择非参数回归的平滑带宽,降低交叉验证带宽的波动,并兼顾不同设计和不光滑回归函数的应用?
方法与思路
作者提出插件式带宽选择,将残差方差和渐近偏差项的估计代入最优带宽表达,并通过迭代估计与回归函数二阶导数有关的泛函。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,理论和模拟显示该方法的带宽波动低于交叉验证,适用于多种设计及不光滑函数,并可扩展到导数、密度和谱密度估计。
阅读关注点
应核对迭代初始化与停止规则、光滑性和设计条件,以及模拟中的比较标准,区分带宽波动降低与最终曲线估计误差改善。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;具体收敛率记号需对照原文,所述小样本表现不能推广至未报告的设定。

原文摘要

The choice of smoothing parameter or bandwidth is crucial when applying nonparametric regression estimators such as kernel estimators. The optimal choice depends on the data at hand. A data-driven bandwidth selection, close to the optimal one, would make these curve estimators objective, more reliable, and easier to use. Minimizing residual mean squared error criteria, such as cross-validation, have been frequently proposed to estimate the optimal smoothing parameter. Empirical and theoretical evidence indicates that cross-validation rules and related methods lead to rather variable estimated optimal bandwidths. The method presented here builds on estimating the asymptotically optimal bandwidth from the data. Since estimators for the residual variance and for an asymptotic expression for the bias are plugged into the asymptotic formula, such selection rules are called “plug-in” estimators. The functional that quantifies bias is approximated by the integrated squared second derivative of the regression function. This functional is determined by an iterative procedure with good convergence properties in theory and practice. A theoretical large-sample analysis shows that the plug-in estimator is attractive in terms of variability, with a relative rate OP (n -1/2) for smooth functions. In contrast, cross-validation leads to a relative rate OP (n -1/10). Despite the estimation of second derivatives involved, asymptotic properties are still adequate for nonsmooth functions. This robustness is desirable for a non-parametric approach. An extensive simulation study confirms the theoretical findings: The plug-in estimator of the bandwidth has much lower variability than cross-validation estimators for a broad variety of situations, including nonsmooth functions. Despite its asymptotic background, it works well for sample sizes as small as n = 15–25. It applies to fixed and to random design, to equally spaced and nonequally spaced design. Additional assets are computational speed and the great flexibility of this approach. It can also be extended to estimating the optimal bandwidth when determining derivatives of a regression function or probability densities and spectrum densities.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文