跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要的研究对象是收入分布,并直接推断不平等与贫困指标,分组数据的参数估计和分布适当性检验均属于分布分析方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

利用分组数据对收入分布进行推断

研究问题
在分组边界未知、仅能获得人口份额与组内平均收入时,如何估计收入分布,并对不平等、贫困指标及分布拟合进行统计推断?
方法与思路
作者由人口比例和组内均值推导通用矩条件、最优权重矩阵及其逆矩阵,以GMM估计参数化收入分布,并构造标准误和分布适当性检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架可用于任意参数化收入分布,较仅用人口比例的多项分布最大似然估计更有效率,并为参数、不平等及贫困指标提供标准误。
阅读关注点
全文应核对未知组界如何处理、矩条件与最优权重成立的条件,以及拟合检验和指标标准误的推导,并检查八个国家或地区应用的拟合表现。
阅读边界
摘要未列出参数识别条件及分组信息要求;效率比较针对仅用人口比例的特定估计法,不能推广到所有替代方法,应用证据也仅覆盖2005年。

原文摘要

We develop a general approach to estimation and inference for income distributions using grouped or aggregate data that are typically available in the form of population shares and class mean incomes, with unknown group bounds. We derive generic moment conditions and an optimal weight matrix that can be used for generalized method-of-moments (GMM) estimation of any parametric income distribution. Our derivation of the weight matrix and its inverse allows us to express the seemingly complex GMM objective function in a relatively simple form that facilitates estimation. We show that our proposed approach, which incorporates information on class means as well as population proportions, is more efficient than maximum likelihood estimation of the multinomial distribution, which uses only population proportions. In contrast to the earlier work of Chotikapanich, Griffiths, and Rao, and Chotikapanich, Griffiths, Rao, and Valencia, which did not specify a formal GMM framework, did not provide methodology for obtaining standard errors, and restricted the analysis to the beta-2 distribution, we provide standard errors for estimated parameters and relevant functions of them, such as inequality and poverty measures, and we provide methodology for all distributions. A test statistic for testing the adequacy of a distribution is proposed. Using eight countries/regions for the year 2005, we show how the methodology can be applied to estimate the parameters of the generalized beta distribution of the second kind (GB2), and its special-case distributions, the beta-2, Singh–Maddala, Dagum, generalized gamma, and lognormal distributions. We test the adequacy of each distribution and compare predicted and actual income shares, where the number of groups used for prediction can differ from the number used in estimation. Estimates and standard errors for inequality and poverty measures are provided. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文