跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:二部图用于记录匹配而非经济网络或干扰分析,纵向数据应用也不足以确定面板方法分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Rebecca C. Steorts
Rob Hall

图式记录链接与去重的贝叶斯方法

研究问题
如何同时链接多个文件中的记录并识别文件内部重复项,同时把链接不确定性传递到后续分析,而非仅输出确定匹配?
方法与思路
作者用记录与潜在真实个体构成的二部图表示链接结构,并通过混合马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛算法进行无监督推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法可估计个体属性与传递性链接概率、衔接后续分析;两个调查应用中报告了较低错误率及较好的扩展性。
阅读关注点
应核对潜在个体与匹配误差的设定、线性时间计算主张的条件,以及比较基准和后续分析如何传播链接不确定性。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未给出误差率和扩展性的数值或完整比较条件,不能认定普遍优越。

原文摘要

We propose an unsupervised approach for linking records across arbitrarily many files, while simultaneously detecting duplicate records within files. Our key innovation involves the representation of the pattern of links between records as a bipartite graph, in which records are directly linked to latent true individuals, and only indirectly linked to other records. This flexible representation of the linkage structure naturally allows us to estimate the attributes of the unique observable people in the population, calculate transitive linkage probabilities across records (and represent this visually), and propagate the uncertainty of record linkage into later analyses. Our method makes it particularly easy to integrate record linkage with post-processing procedures such as logistic regression, capture–recapture, etc. Our linkage structure lends itself to an efficient, linear-time, hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, which overcomes many obstacles encountered by previously record linkage approaches, despite the high-dimensional parameter space. We illustrate our method using longitudinal data from the National Long Term Care Survey and with data from the Italian Survey on Household and Wealth, where we assess the accuracy of our method and show it to be better in terms of error rates and empirical scalability than other approaches in the literature. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组