跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究季节与周期单整序列的协整结构及检验分布,直接属于时间序列分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

周期单整过程的协整

研究问题
周期单整与季节单整序列允许哪些协整形式,协整能否仅在部分季节成立,以及相应检验应使用什么极限分布?
方法与思路
作者区分周期与季节单整结构,分析协整可能性,推导无协整原假设下残差检验的分布,并考察确定性项。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称周期单整过程的协整必须覆盖全部季节,并指出已有周期协整误差修正检验的渐近分布不适用于该类过程。
阅读关注点
应核对周期与季节单整的定义、全部季节协整结论的条件,以及确定性项如何改变残差检验和误差修正检验。
阅读边界
仅依据所给出版社摘要;具体模型条件、临界值及模拟数值未说明,不能把周期单整结论推广到所有季节性序列。

原文摘要

Integration for seasonal time series can take the form of seasonal periodic or nonperiodic integration. When seasonal time series are periodically integrated, we show that any cointegration is either full periodic cointegration or full nonperiodic cointegration, with no possibility of cointegration applying for only some seasons. In contrast, seasonally integrated series can be seasonally, periodically or nonperiodically cointegrated, with the possibility of cointegration applying for a subset of seasons. Cointegration tests are analyzed for periodically integrated series. A residual-based test is examined, and its asymptotic distribution is derived under the null hypothesis of no cointegration. A Monte Carlo analysis shows good performance in terms of size and power. The role of deterministic terms in the cointegrating test regression is also investigated. Further, we show that the asymptotic distribution of the error-correction test for periodic cointegration derived by Boswijk and Franses (1995, Review of Economics and Statistics 77, 436–454) does not apply for periodically integrated processes.The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments of participants at the conference on Unit Root and Cointegration Testing, University of the Algave, September–October 2005, and they particularly thank two anonymous referees and Helmut Lütkepohl (co-editor of this issue of Econometric Theory) for their constructive comments, which have substantially improved the generality of the results in the paper. Tomás del Barrio Castro acknowledges financial support from Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia SEJ2005-07781/ECON.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文