Conditioning on posterior samples for flexible frequentist goodness-of-fit testing
条件于后验样本的灵活频率学派拟合优度检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用拟合优度检验,未提供所列经济计量细分领域的直接研究对象。
条件于后验样本的灵活频率学派拟合优度检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary Tests of goodness of fit are used in nearly every domain where statistics is applied. One powerful and flexible approach is to sample artificial datasets that are exchangeable with the real data under the null hypothesis (but not under the alternative), as this allows the analyst to conduct a valid test using any test statistic they desire. Such sampling is typically done by conditioning on either an exact or an approximate sufficient statistic, but existing methods for doing so have significant limitations, which either preclude their use or substantially reduce their power or computational tractability for many important models. In this article, we propose to condition on samples from a Bayesian posterior distribution, which constitute a very different type of approximate sufficient statistic than those considered in previous work. Our approach, termed approximately co-sufficient sampling via Bayes, considerably expands the scope of thisflexible type of goodness-of-fit testing. We prove the approximate validity of the resulting test and demonstrate its utility on three common null models to which no existing methods apply, as well as its superior performance on models to which existing methods do apply.