跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用拟合优度检验,未提供所列经济计量细分领域的直接研究对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ritwik Bhaduri
Rina Foygel Barber
Lucas Janson

条件于后验样本的灵活频率学派拟合优度检验

研究问题
如何生成在原假设下与真实数据近似可交换的人工数据,使研究者能灵活选择拟合优度统计量而保持检验有效性?
方法与思路
作者把贝叶斯后验样本作为一种近似充分统计量,通过条件于这些样本实施贝叶斯近似共充分抽样。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法扩展了灵活拟合优度检验的适用范围,证明近似有效性,并展示此前方法不适用的三个原假设模型。
阅读关注点
应核对后验样本为何提供近似充分性、检验误差界及其条件,以及后验抽样和人工数据生成的计算要求。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断具体模型及误差大小;近似有效性不等于任意模型下的有限样本精确检验。

原文摘要

Summary Tests of goodness of fit are used in nearly every domain where statistics is applied. One powerful and flexible approach is to sample artificial datasets that are exchangeable with the real data under the null hypothesis (but not under the alternative), as this allows the analyst to conduct a valid test using any test statistic they desire. Such sampling is typically done by conditioning on either an exact or an approximate sufficient statistic, but existing methods for doing so have significant limitations, which either preclude their use or substantially reduce their power or computational tractability for many important models. In this article, we propose to condition on samples from a Bayesian posterior distribution, which constitute a very different type of approximate sufficient statistic than those considered in previous work. Our approach, termed approximately co-sufficient sampling via Bayes, considerably expands the scope of thisflexible type of goodness-of-fit testing. We prove the approximate validity of the resulting test and demonstrate its utility on three common null models to which no existing methods apply, as well as its superior performance on models to which existing methods do apply.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文