跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以环境不变性开展因果特征选择,并讨论因果可识别性。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lucas Kook
Torsten Hothorn
Jonas Peters

面向一般响应类型的模型化因果特征选择

研究问题
如何利用不同环境间因果模型的不变性,在连续、类别、计数及非信息性删失响应中开展因果特征选择并控制检验水平?
方法与思路
作者将变换模型引入不变因果预测,提出基于环境与得分残差条件协方差的 tram-GCM,并在线性平移模型中考察 tram-Wald。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,框架扩展了可处理的响应类型,tram-GCM 具有一致渐近水平保证,并提供 R 软件及重症患者生存特征案例。
阅读关注点
应核对外生环境异质性与可识别性的关系、变换模型设定、删失条件,以及水平保证对模型和残差估计的要求。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;摘要提示缺乏外生异质性时通常不可识别,完整检验条件与功效边界仍未说明。

原文摘要

Discovering causal relationships from observational data is a fundamental yet challenging task. Invariant causal prediction (ICP, Peters et al., 2016) is a method for causal feature selection which requires data from heterogeneous settings and exploits that causal models are invariant. ICP has been extended to general additive noise models and to nonparametric settings using conditional independence tests. However, the latter often suffer from low power (or poor type I error control) and additive noise models are not suitable for applications in which the response is not measured on a continuous scale, but reflects categories or counts. Here, we develop transformation-model (tram) based ICP, allowing for continuous, categorical, count-type, and uninformatively censored responses (these model classes, generally, do not allow for identifiability when there is no exogenous heterogeneity). As an invariance test, we propose tram-GCM based on the expected conditional covariance between environments and score residuals with uniform asymptotic level guarantees. For the special case of linear shift trams, we also consider tram-Wald, which tests invariance based on the Wald statistic. We provide an open-source R package tramicp and evaluate our approach on simulated data and in a case study investigating causal features of survival in critically ill patients.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文