跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要的对象是遗传重组比例与PCR实验误差,虽然涉及异质性,但没有经济面板或其他所列方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
William Navidi
Norman Arnheim

合并多次PCR DNA分型实验数据:精子分型数据的应用

研究问题
合并多次PCR精子分型实验来估计重组比例时,实验间错误率异质性会带来何种偏差,应如何加以处理?
方法与思路
作者分析数据中的实验间错误率差异,提出两个新估计量,并通过模拟比较其与传统合并方法的表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称忽略错误率异质性可能产生有偏估计,新估计量在作者所称现实条件的模拟中表现优于传统方法。
阅读关注点
应核对错误率异质性的建模方式、重组比例与错误率的可辨识条件,以及模拟设计是否覆盖实际合并实验情形。
阅读边界
OpenAlex 索引版本未注明;摘要未给出新估计量形式、具体模拟条件或数值结果,不能将比较优势推广到所有PCR数据。

原文摘要

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a procedure by which the DNA in a single cell can be made to replicate many times in a test tube. By amplifying the DNA from individual sperm cells and typing the results, estimates of male recombination fractions can be made, which are valuable for creating genetic maps and locating regions of unusually intense crossover activity on the human genome. Because PCR typing results are subject to random error, stochastic models must be constructed to obtain accurate results. In practice, to obtain enough information to accurately estimate small recombination fractions, it is necessary to combine data from several PCR experiments. Stochastic models in common use assume that PCR error rates are constant across experiments. We show by analysis of a dataset that PCR error rates can vary considerably from experiment to experiment, and that models that fail to take this heterogeneity into account can produce biased estimators. We present two new estimators and show with simulation studies that they perform better than conventional methods under realistic conditions. These estimators may be appropriate whenever PCR data from several experiments are combined.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文