Improving on Equivariant Estimators
改进等变估计量的方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本讨论一般决策理论与等变估计,未提供所列经济计量细分方向的直接依据。
反馈分类问题改进等变估计量的方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Techniques for improving on equivariant estimators are described. They may be applied, although without assurance of success, whatever be the family of underlying distributions. The loss function is required to satisfy an intuitively reasonable condition but is otherwise arbitrary. One of these techniques amounts to a sample space, orbit-by-orbit analysis of the conditional expected loss given the orbit. It yields, when successful, a "testimator". A second technique obtains the limit of a certain sequence of "testimator-like" estimators. The result is "smoother" than a testimator and often identical to a generalized Bayes estimator over much of its domain. Applications are presented. In the first we extend results of Stein (1964) and obtain a minimax estimator which is generalized Bayes, and in a univariate subcase, admissible within the class of scale-equivariant estimators. In the second, we extend a result of Srivastava and Bancroft (1967).