跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用结构VAR和叙事识别分析财政冲击,并剔除体制变化成分,直接对应冲击分析与结构变化。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Szymon P. Chudziak

控制政策与经济体制的非线性财政乘数

研究问题
当数据以总增长率表示且财政政策包含体制、规则与自主冲击时,如何定义依赖支出冲击规模的财政乘数并分离体制影响?
方法与思路
作者以乘法累计增长率响应构造非线性乘数,结合结构VAR与一种叙事识别方法,区分体制、政策规则和自主冲击。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称乘数可直接由未经季调的名义数据计算;剔除体制成分后,识别冲击和乘数更小,且存在国家与支出类型差异。
阅读关注点
应核对增长率乘法累计与乘数定义、叙事信息的识别作用,以及体制和规则成分如何区分,比较结果是否使用可比口径。
阅读边界
这是arXiv预印本,不能据此声称已同行评审或期刊接收。摘要未提供国家名单、具体识别限制或数值,名义乘数也需核对其解释范围。

原文摘要

A new form of the fiscal multiplier suited to data expressed as gross growth rates is proposed, together with a structural vector autoregression that isolates discretionary fiscal policy from regime and rule-based components. Because cumulating growth-rate responses over a horizon involves a product rather than a sum, the proposed multiplier is multiplicative: both numerator and denominator are polynomials in the size of the fiscal impulse, so the multiplier varies nonlinearly with the scale of the expenditure programme -- a dependence that conventional additive multipliers cannot capture. The multiplier requires no discounting, no ad hoc conversion factor, and no auxiliary estimate of an average expenditure share of output, and it is computed directly from nominal, non-seasonally-adjusted data, matching the terms in which government budgets are actually expressed. A version of the narrative approach to identification is introduced. It allows to decompose the influence of fiscal policy into a regime component, a standard policy rule embedded in the autoregressive structure, and discretionary shocks. Removing the regime component from the residuals yields smaller identified shocks, and correspondingly smaller multipliers, than found in SVARs not controlling for regime changes -- closing much of the gap between SVAR- and DSGE-based estimates. It is found that multipliers vary substantially across countries and across types of government expenditure, that regime volatility itself differs markedly by country, and that several economies display cyclicality in spending and multiplier paths that only becomes visible once responses are cumulated multiplicatively. The resulting multipliers are nominal, derived from unadjusted data, proven to be sensitive to shock size, and purged of regime effects, offering a tool with direct relevance for budget planning and fiscal policy evaluation.

笔记与分组