跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确描述多个个体各有多次测量,并以随机效应处理个体内数据结构,与面板数据方向直接相关。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mary J. Lindstrom
Douglas M. Bates

重复测量线性混合效应模型的 Newton–Raphson 与 EM 算法

研究问题
对于个体重复测量的线性混合效应模型,如何稳定高效地计算极大似然和限制极大似然估计,并比较 NR 与 EM 算法?
方法与思路
作者推导两类似然估计的导数,用矩阵分解实现 NR 和 EM,并改进 NR 以加速收敛、保持随机效应协方差正定。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称良好实现的 NR 在多数情形中优于 EM 及其 Aitken 加速版本,并讨论非独立条件误差和嵌套设计的扩展。
阅读关注点
应核对正定约束的实现、导数和矩阵分解、停止规则及初值,并区分计算阶数分析与两个数据集的性能比较。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,不能推断刊本变化;两个数据集不足以确认普遍速度优势,缺失数据处理的统计条件未详述。

原文摘要

We develop an efficient and effective implementation of the Newton—Raphson (NR) algorithm for estimating the parameters in mixed-effects models for repeated-measures data. We formulate the derivatives for both maximum likelihood and restricted maximum likelihood estimation and propose improvements to the algorithm discussed by Jennrich and Schlüchter (1986) to speed convergence and ensure a positive-definite covariance matrix for the random effects at each iteration. We use matrix decompositions to develop efficient and computationally stable implementations of both the NR algorithm and an EM algorithm (Laird and Ware 1982) for this model. We compare the two methods (EM vs. NR) in terms of computational order and performance on two sample data sets and conclude that in most situations a well-implemented NR algorithm is preferable to the EM algorithm or EM algorithm with Aitken's acceleration. The term repeated measures refers to experimental designs where there are several individuals and several measurements taken on each individual. In the mixed-effects model each individual's vector of responses is modeled as a parametric function, where some of the parameters or “effects” are random variables with a multivariate normal distribution. This model has been successful because it can handle unbalanced data (different designs for different individuals), missing data (observations on all individuals are taken at the same design points, but some individuals have missing data), and jointly dependent random effects. The price for this flexibility is that the parameter estimates may be difficult to compute. We propose some new methods for implementing the EM and NR algorithms and draw conclusions about their performance. We also discuss extensions of the mixed-effects model to incoporate nonindependent conditional error structure and nested-type designs.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文